The Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) gives companies the framework to set clear, actionable goals to reduce emissions in line with the latest climate science. With rising pressure from investors, customers, and regulators, aligning with SBTi is a way to stay ahead. Businesses like Microsoft, Unilever, and IKEA are already leveraging SBTi to drive innovation, boost brand reputation, and cut costs. Here's what you need to know
SBTi stands for the Science-Based Targets initiative, a collaborative, non-profit organisation founded in 2015 by four major climate-focused groups:
Its main purpose is to help businesses set emissions-reduction targets in line with the latest climate science. These targets are carefully designed to keep global warming below 1.5°C, in line with the Paris Agreement—an international treaty formed at the 2015 United Nations ‘COP’ Climate Change Conference, which set the collective goal of reaching net zero emissions by 2050.
Many organisations talk about cutting carbon footprints, but the SBTi ensures those plans aren’t just empty promises. By evaluating a company’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and projected reductions, SBTi provides validation that climate goals are both ambitious and scientifically grounded. This external validation boosts a company’s credibility among stakeholders—customers, investors, and regulators.
For more on SBTi, you can visit the official website at:
Science Based Targets
The Paris Agreement laid crucial groundwork for global climate action. It’s notable because it sets a unifying target—limiting temperature rise to below 2°C, ideally 1.5°C—but leaves each country and organisation to figure out specific action plans. That’s where SBTi plays a pivotal role: it translates the lofty ideals of the Paris Agreement into sector-specific, science-driven steps that companies can follow and track. Rather than simply hoping to reduce emissions, businesses that adopt science-based targets commit to transparent, measurable goals verified by leading climate authorities.
In essence, science-based targets are any emissions-reduction objectives aligned with the best available climate science. Instead of pledging broad statements—like “going green” or “becoming more sustainable”—companies commit to quantifiable metrics over specific timelines. These targets guide businesses to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at a rate consistent with stabilising global temperature rise.
SBTi recognises two main categories of targets:
These two categories work in tandem. Near-term targets create a sense of urgency and ensure progress is measurable right now, while net-zero targets reflect a longer-term trajectory for more fundamental operational overhauls.
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol—a global standard for measuring and managing GHG emissions—classifies emissions into three distinct “Scopes.” SBTi uses this framework to help companies fully account for their emissions footprint.
Companies often prioritise Scope 1 and Scope 2 initially, as these are more straightforward to measure and manage. However, ignoring Scope 3 can undermine a net-zero strategy, given its substantial share of total emissions.
“Because it is science-based, SBTi is perhaps the most trusted certification that your sustainability targets are credible.”
In short, no. The SBTi is a voluntary framework. But while it’s not legally mandated, companies that ignore it may lose out on significant opportunities. Investors, for example, increasingly use ESG metrics to inform decisions, often giving preference to organisations with validated science-based targets. Likewise, customers and employees may favour companies that take tangible steps to address climate concerns. In an era where brand reputation can shift quickly, the cost of inaction could be higher than the effort of aligning with SBTi.
1. Strengthened Brand Reputation
A robust climate commitment can boost your corporate image. As Dexter Galvin, Global Director of Corporates and Supply Chains at CDP, often emphasises, “Setting science-based targets is a strategic move that drives value across multiple dimensions.” A survey found that 79% of executives reported an improved brand reputation after adopting science-based targets. Take Dell, for instance, which publicly credits its SBTi-aligned goals for enhancing its brand appeal among consumers focused on corporate responsibility.
2. Increased Investor Confidence
Financial stakeholders look for future-proof opportunities. Having SBTi validation demonstrates to investors that your business is proactively managing climate risks. Tesco is a prime example: they’ve successfully communicated their SBTi commitments to ethical investors, showcasing strong leadership in the retail sector.
3. Resilience Against Regulation
Another surveyed report indicated that 35% of executives believe SBTi targets offer a buffer against future climate policies and regulations. By integrating science-based strategies early, companies aren’t caught flat-footed by emerging legal requirements.
4. Driving Innovation
SBTi pushes businesses to think differently about products and processes. For example, Sony developed a new plastic called SORPLAS—made of 99% recycled material—reducing CO2 emissions in manufacturing by nearly 80%. This sort of innovation can spur new revenue streams and open up additional markets.
5. Cost Savings
Contrary to the belief that sustainability is always expensive, around 29% of companies surveyed reported net cost savings after setting science-based targets—thanks to operational efficiencies in energy, logistics, and resource management.
6. Competitive Advantage
As the shift to a low-carbon economy accelerates, roughly 55% of businesses reported a direct competitive edge through SBTi commitments. From marketing leverage to favourable supply chain partnerships, being known as a climate-forward organisation can open doors that remain closed to less proactive peers.
The journey typically unfolds in five steps:
Offsets—such as reforestation or purchasing carbon credits—should be a last resort. The initiative stresses actual emission reductions first and foremost. While offsets can cover residual emissions in hard-to-abate sectors (like certain industrial processes), companies must prove they have taken every feasible step to eliminate emissions at the source. This approach ensures that offsets supplement, rather than replace, genuine decarbonisation.
As of the latest update, approximately 9,789 companies worldwide have either set science-based targets or committed to doing so within 24 months. Big names like Microsoft, Unilever, IKEA, and Arsenal Football Club have all embraced SBTi, showcasing its wide appeal across diverse sectors—from tech giants to sports organisations.
Here at Leafr, we specialise in cutting through the complexities of sustainability and helping businesses efficiently reach their climate targets. If SBTi feels daunting, our pool of expert consultants can guide you step-by-step, from your initial materiality assessment to final target validation and beyond.
Our mission is to streamline the journey toward net zero, so you can focus on what you do best while confidently aligning with global best practices—SBTi included.